Exchange Program _Module II_Evaluation_Questionnaire Exchange Programme with the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Module 2 (27 – 31 July 2026) Dear Participants,The Royal Academy of Management is keen to learn about your views on this module. We kindly ask you to complete the attached questionnaire, which will only take a few minutes of your time. Your responses will help us better understand the program’s outcomes and improve the content of future programs.Thank you in advance for your time and cooperation.Please select the option that best reflects your opinion for each statement: 1 = Strongly Disagree (Very Weak) 2 = Disagree (Weak) 3 = Neutral (Acceptable) 4 = Agree (Good) 5 = Strongly Agree (Excellent) (1) Module Content12345The module objectives were clearly declared.The module content was well organized and logically structured.The module topics were relevant to my job tasks and professional role.The level of the content was appropriate for the participants’ background(2) Module Outputs 12345The module contributed to acquiring new and valuable knowledge or insightsThe module contributed to developing skills that can be applied in practiceI now have a clearer ability to benefit from what I learned in my role or job tasksThe module provided effective opportunities to build professional networks and exchange experiences with other participants(3) Module Facilitators / Instructors (in terms of subject-matter expertise, clarity of presentation, and interaction management)12345Andrey MargolinIlya SheburakovFelix GadzaovPetr OtotskyAnna NikitchenkoAndrey PalyutinMaksim ParatunovVadim NikishinAlan Salbiev Mstislav IsakovValery MedovyEmil Khusnetdinov(4) Services and Program Support12345The overall organization of the program was good.The venue / online platform and facilities were appropriateThe accommodation provided was appropriateThe logistical services and support provided were goodThe procedures related to the program (registration, communication, attendance, and organization) were smooth and clearThe quality and quantity of meals / hospitality provided were appropriate(5) Learning:Participation in this program does not imply the absence of prior knowledge or skills in the program topic. Therefore, we would like to know whether the program added new knowledge or skills. Please indicate your level based on your self-assessment of the knowledge and skills acquired during the program.1) On a scale from 1 to 10, how do you rate your level of knowledge and skills in the program topic BEFORE the module? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102) On a scale from 1 to 10, how do you rate your level of knowledge and skills in the program topic AFTER the module? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10(6) Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements 1 = Strongly Disagree (Very Weak) 2 = Disagree (Weak) 3 = Neutral (Acceptable) 4 = Agree (Good) 5 = Strongly Agree (Excellent) As a result of participating in module 2, I am now able to:12345Enhance participants' understanding of the latest global trends in digital transformation, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity.Develop the leadership and strategic skills necessary to lead digital transformation initiatives within government institutions.Learn about leading Russian models and experiences and identify ways to tailor and integrate these practices in the public-sector environment.Enable participants to utilize modern technologies to support innovation, improve services, and enhance institutional performance.Build an international professional network with Russian experts and specialized institutions to foster knowledge exchange and future cooperation.(7) General Questions1. What is the most important benefit or output you gained from this module?2. How do you expect this module to be reflected in your performance or role in the coming period (actions you intend to apply in your work)?3. Which aspects of the module need further development or improvement (specific suggestions related to content or organization)?4. Do you have any specific comments regarding the faculty, trainers, lecturers, or training facilitators?5. On a scale from 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend this program to your colleagues or acquaintances? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Submit