Etimad IV Module 4 Ev Cohort 2 ETIMAD IVModule 4 Cohort 2: (18–20 October 2026) Dear Participants,The Royal Academy of Management is keen to learn about your views on this module. We kindly ask you to complete the attached questionnaire, which will only take a few minutes of your time. Your responses will help us better understand the program’s outcomes and improve the content of future programs.Thank you for your time, valuable input, and cooperation.Group:- Select -12345678Please select the option that best reflects your opinion for each statement: 1 = Strongly Disagree (Very Weak) 2 = Disagree (Weak) 3 = Neutral (Acceptable) 4 = Agree (Good) 5 = Strongly Agree (Excellent) (1) Module Content12345The module objectives were clearly declared.The module content was well organized and logically structured.The module topics were relevant to my job tasks and professional role.The level of the content was appropriate for the participants’ background(2) Module Outputs 12345The module contributed to acquiring new and valuable knowledge or insightsThe module contributed to developing skills that can be applied in practiceI now have a clearer ability to benefit from what I learned in my role or job tasksThe module provided effective opportunities to build professional networks and exchange experiences with other participants(3) Module Facilitators / Instructors (in terms of subject-matter expertise, clarity of presentation, and interaction management)12345Lead Faculty: Neil PerkinCo-facilitator: Reem Ghaddar(4) Services and Program Support12345The overall organization of the program was good.The venue / online platform and facilities were appropriateThe logistical services and support provided were goodThe procedures related to the program (registration, communication, attendance, and organization) were smooth and clearThe quality and quantity of meals / hospitality provided were appropriate(5) Learning:Participation in this program does not imply the absence of prior knowledge or skills in the program topic. Therefore, we would like to know whether the program added new knowledge or skills. Please indicate your level based on your self-assessment of the knowledge and skills acquired during the program.1) On a scale from 1 to 10, how do you rate your level of knowledge and skills in the program topic BEFORE the Module? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 102) On a scale from 1 to 10, how do you rate your level of knowledge and skills in the program topic AFTER the Module? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10(6) Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements (scale from 1 to 5). 1 = Strongly Disagree (Very Weak) 2 = Disagree (Weak) 3 = Neutral (Acceptable) 4 = Agree (Good) 5 = Strongly Agree (Excellent) Participating in module 4 helped me to:12345Understand how leaders translate strategic intent into clear priorities and action during change.Distinguish technical from adaptive challenges and choose more appropriate responses for clear, complicated, and complex situations.Understand how flow, feedback, experimentation, and course-correction can strengthen change execution.Understand the change equation, Maurer's levels of resistance, and how to treat resistance as useful information rather than simply opposition.Attain practical tools for working with formal and informal influence networks, supporters, neutrals, and resistors.Make the change-leadership concepts practical and memorable, and that is through The applied exercises and case studies (including activities such as Broken Telephone, LEGO Tower, Desert Survival, Triangulation, and the Ballpoint Game) Integrate the module learning and practice leading change through decisions, resistance, and competing priorities and that is through the practice of the ChangeQuest simulation.(7) General Questions:1. What is the most important benefit or output you gained from this module?2. How do you expect this module to be reflected in your performance or role in the coming period (actions you intend to apply in your work)?3. Which aspects of the module need further development or improvement (specific suggestions related to content or organization)?4. Do you have any specific comments regarding the faculty, trainers, lecturers, or training facilitators?5. On a scale from 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend this program to your colleagues or acquaintances? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Submit
